Unnamed Meadow 36 Assessment

General Information
Assessment Date: 
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Meadow Name: 
Unnamed Meadow 36
Meadow Reference: 
Organization Affiliation: 
Assessment Completed: 
Yes
General Characteristics
Watershed: 
Land Ownership: 
Physical Condition
Main Channel Bank Height: 
Natural Condition
Gullies: 
Natural Condition
Total Bank Stability: 
Natural Condition
Vegetation Cover: 
Slightly Impacted
Bare Ground: 
Heavily Impacted
Encroachment: 
Heavily Impacted
Assessment Points: 
17
Restoration Efforts
Restoration Efforts: 
Yes
Comments on Restoration: 
Weir at meadow base
Additional Observations
Headcut Present: 
No
Aspen Trees Present: 
No
Beavers: 
No
Fish Observed: 
No
Grazing and Cattle
Grazing Trails: 
No
Stubble: 
No
Dung in Channel: 
No
Hoof Prints on Banks: 
No
Human Impacts
Trail: 
No
Evidence of OHV use: 
Yes
Road: 
Yes
Corral: 
No
Building: 
No
Vehical Access: 
Yes
Adjacent Land Use
Adjacent Culvert: 
No
Adjacent Bridge: 
No
Adjacent Road: 
Yes
Adjacent Building: 
No
Coverage
Gopher Disturbance: 
0%
Willow, Alder, and Aspen Coverage: 
0%
Surveyors
Jacob Dyste
Meg Hanley
Comments
General Comments: 
- Very dry meadow with dry channel - Channel is slightly inset, deep enough to have converted most of the meadow to sage - Weir at bottom of meadow is helping the very base of the meadow - Heavy OHV use, tire tracks in channel

Images